In a recent essay, Metropolis Magazine's Philip Nobel took aim at the new Institute of Contemporary Art and its architects, Diller Scofidio + Renfro.
In the essay, he highlights design and execution problems of the building, and criticizes the fact that many starchitects seem to get a free pass on mediocre buildings by architecture critics.
I have yet to visit the new ICA (blasphemy, I know), and I have several years to get to the point of expertise that Philip Nobel has, but I am quite impressed by the building.
Nobel writes "The museum sits on the edge of the water, and reaches toward it with a deep cantilever, but to the land it shows only its back—and not a particularly well-groomed one at that." I think the view from behind, of a plain, near-windowless white box, strikes as true modernism. That modernist box will be the centerpiece of the multi-use area once Fan Pier is developed.
I don't think that a substandard product should get praise just because it was designed by a "star" architect. But, Boston is not very friendly to modern design, so any progress towards modernism needs to be heralded.
Also, be sure to check Greg Cookland's write up of the Metropolis article.